Skip to content

OPINION | AM 101: Tips from three industry experts to Reduce Costs and Lead Time in 3D printing.

Share this article

LinkedInFacebookXWhatsAppE-mail

3D ADEPT · AUDIO

Listen to this article

12 min

Narrated using a synthetic voice.

Illustration linking time and manufacturing success
Image: visualsouth

Three contributions collected for the July/August 2022 issue of 3D ADEPT Mag, then published online in December 2022. Roles and experience reflect that period. Advice needs adaptation to the process, machine and part requirements.

Engineers and designers have been manufacturing prototypes for decades, but the tools, materials and processes used to create them continuously evolve.  The truth is, in order to close the gap between as designed and as manufactured, there is a wide range of processes that need to be understood, mastered and optimized. Sometimes, achieving satisfying results in an AM production remains very dependent on the holistic experience of users as cost factors, efficiencies and design rules do not (always) directly translate from one project to another. However, it never hurts to learn from others’ experience. In this opinion article, three experts who have built up expertise in various sectors of activity ( space, R&D and pedestrian management systems) share a few tips they wish they’d known sooner in their 3D printing journey.

Sabrina Kerber: know your machine

Sabrina Kerber, space architect and analogue astronaut featured in this 2022 interview.
Sabrina Kerber, space architect and analogue astronaut featured in this 2022 interview.

Sabrina Kerber is a space architect and analogue astronaut. At the time of this 2022 interview, she works as UAV Pilot at Avy and was part of a lunar simulation at the renowned HI-SEAS habitat, where she acted as crew engineer. She has always been working on leveraging the benefits of additive manufacturing for extra-terrestrial habitation.

 “My favorite tip on optimizing the additive manufacturing workflow and ensuring a cost and time efficient process is ‘Get to know your machine!’ Invest time in learning anything you can about your hardware and software, but also about your specific use case and the exact environment you will be operating in. This might cost you some hours and material in the beginning, but in the long run, really knowing the quirks of your tool will result in a streamlined process with optimal results.

Every 3D printer is a little different; every environment has a different set of parameters – the outcome of your prints can be influenced by the altitude you print at, the humidity and temperature and how well you are able to control these factors with your machine. At the same time, every use case calls for different aspects and results. Make sure you know where the weak points of your print are – metaphorically speaking, as well as quite literally.

In which areas can you save on time, which points will need special attention during the design and print process? I’m investigating the advantages of additive manufacturing for space exploration, the most important of which is the possibility to reduce payload and lower the necessity for resupply missions – both of which will result in a more time and cost efficient mission. However, in an isolated environment, such as a space mission or analog simulation, successfully using 3D printing heavily relies on the crew knowing every detail about the workflow of their specific machine, as well as what to expect of it in such an extreme environment.”

Juan Carlos Cruz Robles: plan post-processing

Juan Carlos Cruz Robles, additive manufacturing specialist featured in this 2022 interview.
Juan Carlos Cruz Robles, additive manufacturing specialist featured in this 2022 interview.

Juan Carlos Cruz Robles has spent the last 10 years in R&D of additive manufacturing technologies. Out of those years, 6 have been dedicated to developing hardware and material process development for vat photopolymerization technologies at 3D Systems. Shortly before this 2022 interview, he made a transition to PPG, where he is bringing his additive experience to strengthen their capabilities. Below, he points out an important factor to increase productivity for vat photopolymerization AM technologies:

“There are several approaches on how to be as efficient as possible on a workflow when using any of these AM technologies. A big part of the workflow is post-processing. Many people think speed in 3D printing is the bottleneck. However, most of the times, a functional part in any AM technology must be subjected to a post-processing cycle, which sometimes can even take longer than the printing step. Therefore, it is crucial for an efficient AM process to consider the potential bottlenecks in the post processing cycle to get as much throughput as possible.  

For VAT photopolymerization post processing especially, cleaning is key to not only remove excess of resin but also sometimes to treat surfaces from not getting sticky. Depending on resin viscosities mostly and cleaning solvents, the cleaning cycle can increase overtime if the cleaning solvents are not monitored constantly. Typical cleaning solvents are IPA, TPM or a combination of both. A hydrometer is recommended to constantly check the saturation of the solvents and make sure a threshold is not reached. Otherwise, the cleaning process will just take longer and eventually not work at all.”

Practical clarification: solvent, hydrometer and threshold depend on the resin/cleaner system; an IPA/TPM mixture is not a universal recipe. Formlabs notes, for example, that its Form Wash IPA hydrometer has the wrong range for TPM. Follow manufacturer instructions and safety data sheets; washing, complete drying and post-curing are distinct steps.

Post-processing can account for a significant share of total time: washing, depowdering, support removal, finishing or inspection, depending on process and use. Identify the operations actually required before considering automation, then compare throughput, cost, quality and volume. Our post-processing feature reviews the different stages.

Josep Maria Salvador Morón: schedule builds

Josep Maria Salvador Morón is a designer and technical manager at DLIMIT, a company that has over 15 years of experience in the manufacture and distribution of pedestrian management systems.

 “If you want to optimize your 3D printing workflow, I always recommend a little planning. It’s super important to know how long the parts take to print. If I will have enough material for a particular print or if the part will be finished tomorrow when I get to the office. These types of questions lead you to answers such as, it is sometimes better to print fewer pieces and be able to make two prints within your working day, than to fill the surface completely and have your print stop at 19:00, when there is no one in the office to make a new print.

Two parts presented by DLIMIT
Two parts presented by DLIMIT. Image: DLIMIT.

On the other hand, if we are talking about a large number of parts to be produced, there are technologies and 3D printers such as BCN3D’s IDEX technology that prints two identical or symmetrical prototypes at the same time, optimising production times.  For example, it is not the same to print 40 units on a printing surface with one extruder as it is to print 20 + 20 with two extruders working simultaneously. It is the same 40 units, but we have reduced the production time by half.

At the design level, it is always advisable to reduce the size of the parts as much as possible in order to save time and material. Sometimes, internal departments tend to oversize parts to give them more mechanical consistency. I recommend trusting the technology, without asking for the impossible. It may seem complicated at first, but with practice you learn a lot.”

The halving example concerns duplication or mirror modes on a compatible IDEX system, for parts that fit its usable volume. It does not promise to halve the complete delivery lead time. Any reduction in dimensions or material must also preserve the part’s mechanical and functional requirements. BCN3D’s description of the modes.

Planning options to assess

  • Batch compatible parts in one build while respecting process constraints.
  • Schedule short and long builds around available working hours; plan overnight cycles only where the equipment, manufacturer instructions and site risk assessment permit them.
  • Distribute work across printers whose capacity and qualification suit the parts.
  • Use alerts and dashboards to follow builds; remote monitoring does not replace site safety measures.

That being said, you may read thousands of tips per day, but if you don’t understand your needs and the reasons why you choose a specific AM process over another, chances are that you won’t be satisfied with your results. As you may have realized, finish and details won’t necessarily matter for basic concept models, while real-life prototypes may need technologies and materials designed for fine details and high-quality surface finishes.

And you, what 3D printing process do you use and what’s your tip to optimize your production workflow?

This article was first published in the July/August 2022 issue of 3D ADEPT Mag.

THE 3D ADEPT WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

The industry moves fast. Stay ahead.

Every week, the latest additive manufacturing news, in-depth features and real-world applications, straight to your inbox. Plus, be the first to know when a new issue of 3D ADEPT Mag is out.

Free · One email a week · Unsubscribe anytime

Clicking loads our email provider’s sign-up form, including its analytics and Google’s anti-bot protection. You’re only subscribed if you complete the sign-up. Read our privacy policy.

Open the form in a new tab ↗

The experts in this feature

All Experts & Contributors →

Share this article

LinkedInFacebookXWhatsAppE-mail

The weekly newsletter

Essential AM knowledge, delivered weekly.

News, in-depth features and industry perspectives, in your inbox.

Receive the newsletter